
Ah, Back to Antennas Again!
The
truth is, with DTV, the need for outdoor antennas
will increase dramatically
As
the big clock on the wall ticks away on analog television, the digital
picture continues to get muddier. However, one issue is now getting
clearer—the truth about the need for an outdoor antenna.

Centris,
the media market research firm, is back with new data that claims
9.2 million American homes could experience problems with over-the-air
digital reception when the switch is pulled next February. The company
says there are more than 17 million households currently receiving
analog signals and half of those are located in challenging reception
areas.
Actually,
more than half—54 percent, to be exact. These are not people who live
in out-of-the-way rural areas, but the largest cities in the United
States—including New York and Los Angeles. There’s a good chance that
more people than originally thought will need outdoor antennas.
However,
most interesting is the assertion that 75 percent of those over-the-air
viewers have only indoor “rabbit ears,” rather than a proper ‘50s-era
outdoor antenna.
Before
we go on, a little history lesson is in order. It was early 1998,
at Sony’s pre-NAB press event in New York, when the company’s then
chief technology officer, Peter Dare, stunned his colleagues with
the radical statement that among the unresolved DTV issues were reception
problems without an outdoor antenna.
It
was a stunning admission, at the time, because Dare had burst Sony’s
DTV bubble of hype. Since DTV was “perfect,” how could Dare say such
a thing—especially at an important news conference?
Sony’s
PR apparat went into hyperventilation over Dare’s candid remarks about
that and other DTV problems. Soon after, Dare went into a sort of
public exile at Sony. Of course, time would prove he was dead-on right.
Though
proponents still get hysterical over any criticism of DTV, Centris
has plowed on under great criticism. The company, who revealed potential
gaps in reception last February, said its new study provides the first
in-depth national look at the scale of the reception issue, and identifies
the top 10 cities in the country that have the most consumers at-risk.
The
top 10 most at risk markets are, in order, New York; Boston; Philadelphia;
Los Angeles; Washington, D.C.; Seattle–Tacoma, Wash.; San Francisco–Oakland–San
Jose, Calif.; Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minn.; Atlanta; and Cleveland–Akron,
Ohio.
Quality
of reception, said Centris, depends on the terrain, distance from
transmission towers, and sensitivity of antennas. The definition of
“challenging reception” is that the viewer can receive only four or
fewer broadcast TV stations if they have a small or medium omnidirectional
rooftop antenna or if they have an indoor antenna.
Centris
forecasts that 24 percent of consumers in difficult reception areas
who have such antennas will receive no channels, and a further 10
percent will receive only a single channel. Barry Goodstadt, a Centris
senior vice president, said the firm’s estimates are conservative
since the study assumes that all consumers have rooftop antennas.
Needless
to say, these predictions are far worse than those by the television
industry or the powers that be in government. Now, all these years
after the “grand alliance,” we’ll finally find out how well DTV works.
As
might be expected, David Donovan, president of the Association for
Maximum Service Television, blasted the Centris report for its accuracy.
But then he confirmed a major part of it.
First,
Donovan claimed that Centris did not conduct spectrum analysis or
test signal strengths in the markets, and does not reflect the actual
permanent channel space the stations will use when analog is switched
off. Fair enough.
However,
then he turned to the need for outdoor antennas.
“The
issue is whether consumers will be able to receive signals with the
same type of antenna they are currently using to receive analog signals,”
Donovan said. “Of course, this may not be known until stations operate
on their permanent digital channels and increase their coverage area
in February 2009.”
Donovan
also said there is “no doubt” that some Americans must be “reintroduced”
to antennas as we move into DTV. “Some consumers may need a new antenna,”
he admitted.
“If
consumers do need more sensitive antennas, we would remind policy
makers that these antennas are more susceptible to receiving interference.
Accordingly, reception problems will be exacerbated by placing interfering
unlicensed devices in the TV band,” Donovan said.
Wait
a minute! That last comment is yet another threat to the FCC that
unlicensed devices that use “white space” spectrum—which is not licensed
to the broadcasters—could interfere with DTV signals. Of course, such
spectrum could open the nation to a cheap source of wireless Internet
access. Some very legitimate companies are advocating it. The broadcasters
want it left alone.
An
entirely separate argument, Mr. Donovan!
TRIP
TO THE ROOF
So,
let’s review. Now, we finally learn there’s a good chance that many
more people than originally expected will need outdoor antennas. Good
luck!
Does
anyone actually believe that hordes of Americans will climb onto their
rooftops—just as in the 1950s—to install an antenna in order to receive
their local DTV stations?
I
suspect not. When the full-power analog signal goes dark next Feb.
17, I think that many Americans will simply pick up the telephone
and call their cable, satellite or telephone company. They’ll complain
about the lack of free TV for a while, but will soon forget it was
ever free.
Most
are already too addicted.
By
Frank Beacham www.tvtechnology.com
HOME
HOME
Headlines
Suspect
in fatal crash found in TV vehicle
NBC11
Reporter Robbed While Covering Story On Smash-And-Grabs
LA
TV news stringers to become TruTV series

Wilmington
to be digital TV test market
Barrington
To Slash Staff
WNBC
Plans 24-Hour News Channel
ABC
News to launch on-campus bureaus
Some
Pappas Telecasting Stations file for Chapter 11
Deputies
use Taser on sportscaster in jai
l
Jane
Fonda Slips C-Word Past NBC Today Censors

CBS
Lays Off CSTV Staffers
Man
charged in snowmobile crash that killed TV anchor
Former
Tampa Reporter busted for Child Porn

Former
Boise TV anchor arrested for domestic abuse

Former
Meteorologist Wants Jail Sentence Tossed

Davenport
TV station lays off 12, cancels 2 newscasts
Can
Columbus' famously combustible news director be tamed?
GM
apologizes for weatherman's goof
L.A.
mayor's girlfriend demoted by TV station
FCC
urges fine for Comcast
BBC
to integrate news operation
NFL's
new vest policy is out of line
Another
news chopper incident
Ex-forecaster
insists she's not guilty of shoplifting

'Early
Show' bails on flooded studio

Pit
bulls attack TV, radio station workers
Police
review actions of TV crew at office protest
Voice-over
actor tapped as traffic reporter
Family
files civil suit against anchor
Eyewitness
News back on after fire
Broken
Pipe Cripples TV News
Philly
shooter slugged
Photog
arrested
Camerawoman
files claim against Los Angeles
Global
TV cameraman saves toddler
Pittsburgh
station sorry for misplaced news tease
Hopefuls
jam station's traffic-reporter tryout

News
anchor jailed, charged with felony
Man
accused of threatening TV reporter
Another
TV News Copter Goes Down

TV
Station Fires Worker Over Porn Prank
TV
Reporter Found Guilty Of Contempt

TV
Helicopter Pilot Saves Stranded Deer
*Watch
video
Pols
Call For Warning Labels on Analog-Only TV Sets
No
charges in arrest of 'Car Czar' reporter
Former
Channel 7 analyst arrested on child sex charges
Philly
station launches mostly unscripted newscast
Boston
TV's Ansin defends mass firings
Charity's
director sues WFLA-TV reporter
Boston
radio giant fires entire news team
Roanoke
TV station fires meteorologist over MySpace photo

'Borat' duped TV producer

Former TV Reporter Indicted For Cruise Ship Conduct With Boys
KTMD
losing most of news staff
Broadcast
Workers Oppose Dereg
TV
Takes a Page Out of Newspaper Hardships
Students
make 'Point' on TV news

Fox
journalists released in Gaza Strip, ending nearly two week hostage ordeal
Cincy
TV stations settle sideline-camera flap
Death
stuns, angers reporter's family
Bossier
City businessman accused of attacking TV crew
Wife
of kidnapped Fox cameraman makes tearful plea for release
Ex-news
anchor arrest

Popular Weatherman
Passes

Former
TV personality charged with soliciting a child

Voice
of the Razorbacks Dies in Car Accident
Sentence
in crash that kills photog
Cameraman
tossed from tour
TV
station editor beaten up over report about broken privatisation promises

Chopper
4 crashes during search
Once again a near death incident. Glad everyone's safe...but
here's another reason why I've given up helicopters for good.

Cameraman
Claims He Slept With Princess Diana
Now that's what I'm talkin' about. You go get 'em
cameraman!

Broadcasters'
audience size sets new low
The least-watched week in history. Going downnnnn....
Bank
robbery foiled by TV reporter
Fox,
AP Settle Photog Flap
"Miraculous
Recovery" for CBS' Dozier

Holdin'
Globes
New
pandemic fear as cameraman falls ill in bird flu village
Reporter
killed in head-on collision
NBCU
Puts Four Stations Up for Sale

PGA
Announces New Agreements With CBS, NBC

Fire
kills anchorman
Former
TV reporter charged with shoplifting
Anchorwoman
Accepts Proposal on Air
Ex-TV
reporter Barth joins race for seat in Congress
ABC
Cameraman shot dead in Baghdad
Shootout
video cameraman drops out of sight
Spitting
at TV cameraman earns suspension
Pittsburgh
TV Reporter Cited For Trespassing

TV photogs attacked outside court
Break-in
delays W. Va. newscast debut
Viacom lays off 11 at KOVR, KMAX
Colo.
station suspends local news

NFL
won't act on Benson altercation with TV crew
Cameras
Captured a Disaster but Now Focus on Suffering
Cameraman Assaulted